Study permit holders
15
2025
HowSoonIsNow.ca
Data Explorer
Public Data Analytics
Study Permit Holders by Institution
Professional Analytical Report
Canadian Mennonite University · 2025
Prepared September 24, 2026 8:32 AM
Report parameters
Year
2025
Institution
Canadian Mennonite University
Province or territory
Manitoba
Institution type
University
Analysis
Institution
Executive summary
Institution summary
Rank among comparable institutions
#8
Manitoba · University
Share of comparable total
0.2%
Canadian Mennonite University
Historical peak
40
2022
This report summarizes published study permit-holder data for Canadian Mennonite University in 2025, including historical context, peer rankings, suppression information, and annual trends.
Trend analysis
Annual study permit trend for Canadian Mennonite University
Annual published study permit-holder totals for Canadian Mennonite University.
Historical context
Historical performance
Peak year
2022
40 permit holders
Historical average
35
Complete years
Selected year
15
2025
Vs. historical average
%
At average
Key insights
What the data shows
- 1 Rank among comparable institutions Canadian Mennonite University ranks #8 among universities in Manitoba for 2025.
- 2 Share of comparable total Canadian Mennonite University represents 0.2% of the published study permit-holder total among universities in Manitoba in 2025.
Study level comparison
Top institutions
| Rank | Institution | Study permit holders | Share | Suppressed records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University of Manitoba | 3,865 | 63.4% | 0 |
| 2 | The University of Winnipeg | 920 | 15.1% | 0 |
| 3 | International College of Manitoba | 490 | 8.0% | 0 |
| 4 | Providence University College and Theological Seminary | 390 | 6.4% | 0 |
| 5 | Brandon University | 185 | 3.0% | 0 |
| 6 | Université de Saint-Boniface | 155 | 2.5% | 3 |
| 7 | Booth University College | 75 | 1.2% | 3 |
| 8 | Canadian Mennonite University | 15 | 0.2% | 10 |
| 9 | University College of the North | 0 | 0.0% | 7 |
Historical trend
Annual study permit trend for Canadian Mennonite University
| Year | Study permit holders | YoY change | Suppressed records | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 5 | — | 7 | Year to date |
| 2016 | 40 | — | 6 | Year to date |
| 2017 | 20 | — | 8 | Year to date |
| 2018 | 30 | — | 9 | Complete year |
| 2019 | 40 | — | 6 | Year to date |
| 2020 | 15 | — | 7 | Year to date |
| 2021 | 20 | — | 6 | Year to date |
| 2022 | 40 | — | 6 | Complete year |
| 2023 | 50 | — | 4 | Year to date |
| 2024 | 15 | — | 9 | Year to date |
| 2025 | 15 | — | 10 | Year to date |
Dataset information
About this report
Source, selection, coverage, and generation details for this analytical report.
- Dataset
- Study permit holders by designated learning institution and year
- Publisher
- Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
- Year
- 2025
- Institution
- Canadian Mennonite University
- Province or territory
- Manitoba
- Institution type
- University
- Analysis
- Institution
- Records included
- 0
- Report generated
- September 24, 2026, 8:32 a.m.
Methodology
How this report was prepared
This report uses published Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada study permit-holder data by designated learning institution and the year in which study permits became effective.
Historical totals, peer rankings, shares, annual changes, suppression counts, and analytical findings are derived from the same normalized records used by the interactive Study Permit Explorer.
Important note
Published totals may exclude suppressed values. Institution names are preserved from the official IRCC source and may identify campuses or locations separately.
About Data Explorer
Public data, made easier to explore
Data Explorer is a collection of interactive tools that transform official public datasets into searchable charts, summaries, analytical reports, and downloadable documents.
The information presented in this report is derived from published source data. Charts, calculated values, and analytical highlights are generated automatically from normalized records while preserving the meaning of the original dataset.
End of report