HowSoonIsNow.ca Data Explorer Public Data Analytics

Study Permit Holders by Institution

Professional Analytical Report

Emily Carr University of Art and Design · 2025

Prepared September 24, 2026 12:16 PM

Report parameters

Year 2025
Institution Emily Carr University of Art and Design
Province or territory British Columbia
Institution type University
Analysis Institution

Executive summary

Institution summary

Study permit holders

225

2025

Rank among comparable institutions

#14

British Columbia · University

Share of comparable total

0.9%

Emily Carr University of Art and Design

Historical peak

310

2022

This report summarizes published study permit-holder data for Emily Carr University of Art and Design in 2025, including historical context, peer rankings, suppression information, and annual trends.

Trend analysis

Annual study permit trend for Emily Carr University of Art and Design

Annual published study permit-holder totals for Emily Carr University of Art and Design.

322 277 232 188 143 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 225 2025 Study permit holders Year

Historical context

Historical performance

Peak year

2022

310 permit holders

Historical average

242

Complete years

Selected year

225

2025

Vs. historical average

-7.0%

Below average

Key insights

What the data shows

  1. 1 Below historical peak Emily Carr University of Art and Design had 27.4% fewer published study permit holders in 2025 than at its historical peak in 2022.
  2. 2 Compared with historical average Emily Carr University of Art and Design's 2025 published total is 7.0% below its historical average for complete years.

Study level comparison

Top institutions

Rank Institution Study permit holders Share Suppressed records
1 University of British Columbia 8,780 34.7% 0
2 Simon Fraser University 3,145 12.4% 0
3 University Canada West 2,520 10.0% 0
4 University of Victoria 2,010 7.9% 0
5 Thompson Rivers University 1,700 6.7% 0
6 Kwantlen Polytechnic University 1,565 6.2% 0
7 Trinity Western University 1,435 5.7% 0
8 Capilano University 1,355 5.4% 0
9 University of the Fraser Valley 855 3.4% 0
10 Royal Roads University 505 2.0% 0

Historical trend

Annual study permit trend for Emily Carr University of Art and Design

Year Study permit holders YoY change Suppressed records Coverage
2015 165 2 Complete year
2016 225 +36.4% 0 Complete year
2017 240 +6.7% 1 Complete year
2018 205 -14.6% 0 Complete year
2019 240 +17.1% 1 Complete year
2020 155 -35.4% 3 Complete year
2021 305 +96.8% 0 Complete year
2022 310 +1.6% 0 Complete year
2023 295 -4.8% 0 Complete year
2024 295 0.0% 0 Complete year
2025 225 -23.7% 1 Complete year

Dataset information

About this report

Source, selection, coverage, and generation details for this analytical report.

Dataset
Study permit holders by designated learning institution and year
Publisher
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
Year
2025
Institution
Emily Carr University of Art and Design
Province or territory
British Columbia
Institution type
University
Analysis
Institution
Records included
0
Report generated
September 24, 2026, 12:16 p.m.

Methodology

How this report was prepared

This report uses published Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada study permit-holder data by designated learning institution and the year in which study permits became effective.

Historical totals, peer rankings, shares, annual changes, suppression counts, and analytical findings are derived from the same normalized records used by the interactive Study Permit Explorer.

Important note

Published totals may exclude suppressed values. Institution names are preserved from the official IRCC source and may identify campuses or locations separately.

About Data Explorer

Public data, made easier to explore

Data Explorer is a collection of interactive tools that transform official public datasets into searchable charts, summaries, analytical reports, and downloadable documents.

The information presented in this report is derived from published source data. Charts, calculated values, and analytical highlights are generated automatically from normalized records while preserving the meaning of the original dataset.

End of report