Study permit holders
35
2025
HowSoonIsNow.ca
Data Explorer
Public Data Analytics
Study Permit Holders by Institution
Professional Analytical Report
Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc · 2025
Prepared September 24, 2026 8:33 AM
Report parameters
Year
2025
Institution
Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc
Province or territory
Ontario
Institution type
Career College
Analysis
Institution
Executive summary
Institution summary
Rank among comparable institutions
#19
Ontario · Career College
Share of comparable total
0.8%
Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc
Historical peak
645
2023
This report summarizes published study permit-holder data for Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc in 2025, including historical context, peer rankings, suppression information, and annual trends.
Trend analysis
Annual study permit trend for Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc
Annual published study permit-holder totals for Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc.
Historical context
Historical performance
Peak year
2023
645 permit holders
Historical average
352
Complete years
Selected year
35
2025
Vs. historical average
%
At average
Study level comparison
Top institutions
| Rank | Institution | Study permit holders | Share | Suppressed records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Niagara College Canada at Toronto school of Management | 1,210 | 26.6% | 0 |
| 2 | Yorkville University - Toronto Film School | 445 | 9.8% | 0 |
| 3 | Beta College of Business and Technology | 400 | 8.8% | 0 |
| 4 | NewCastle College of Business and Technology | 370 | 8.1% | 0 |
| 5 | ILAC International College | 325 | 7.2% | 0 |
| 6 | North American School of Information Technology Inc NASIT | 310 | 6.8% | 0 |
| 7 | Ontario College of Business and Technology | 260 | 5.7% | 0 |
| 8 | Flair College of Management and Technology | 170 | 3.7% | 1 |
| 9 | Toronto School of Management | 165 | 3.6% | 1 |
| 10 | Academy of Learning Career and Business College - Owen Sound | 145 | 3.2% | 1 |
Historical trend
Annual study permit trend for Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc
| Year | Study permit holders | YoY change | Suppressed records | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 95 | — | 4 | Complete year |
| 2016 | 245 | +157.9% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2017 | 440 | +79.6% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2018 | 450 | +2.3% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2019 | 380 | -15.6% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2020 | 190 | -50.0% | 3 | Complete year |
| 2021 | 220 | +15.8% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2022 | 560 | +154.5% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2023 | 645 | +15.2% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2024 | 295 | -54.3% | 0 | Complete year |
| 2025 | 35 | — | 5 | Year to date |
Dataset information
About this report
Source, selection, coverage, and generation details for this analytical report.
- Dataset
- Study permit holders by designated learning institution and year
- Publisher
- Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada
- Year
- 2025
- Institution
- Greystone College of Business and Technology Toronto Inc
- Province or territory
- Ontario
- Institution type
- Career College
- Analysis
- Institution
- Records included
- 0
- Report generated
- September 24, 2026, 8:33 a.m.
Methodology
How this report was prepared
This report uses published Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada study permit-holder data by designated learning institution and the year in which study permits became effective.
Historical totals, peer rankings, shares, annual changes, suppression counts, and analytical findings are derived from the same normalized records used by the interactive Study Permit Explorer.
Important note
Published totals may exclude suppressed values. Institution names are preserved from the official IRCC source and may identify campuses or locations separately.
About Data Explorer
Public data, made easier to explore
Data Explorer is a collection of interactive tools that transform official public datasets into searchable charts, summaries, analytical reports, and downloadable documents.
The information presented in this report is derived from published source data. Charts, calculated values, and analytical highlights are generated automatically from normalized records while preserving the meaning of the original dataset.
End of report